Wednesday, January 21, 2009

On the UN hot seat

The following article was in the Winnipeg Free Press this past weekend. The article causes you to pause and think. As Métis Mama, I have expressed in the past that I believe the Government of Canada (both the Liberals and the Conservatives) should have supported the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People. They have been involved in the proposing and amending of the text and at some point their position is embarrassing but even more disconcerting was the statement in the article: "Earlier this week, Canada was the only country to vote against -- there were 33 for and 13 abstentions -- a resolution condemning Israel for its invasion of Gaza."

I guess if they won't take a stand after what seems to be a global outcry or at the least abstain from the vote .... what chance do Aboriginal people have of ever negotiating their rights. That is why so much money continues to be spent in court rooms - defining the boundaries of Aboriginal rights. Another colossal waste of tax dollars that make lawyers rich in the courtrooms and never at a bargaining table where the resources could be spent on issues that benefit everyone.

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/breakingnews/on_the_un_hot_seat.html#

OTTAWA — Do you like to think Canada is a haven for human rights? When you hear of atroci­ties in other countries, do you pat yourself on the back and think at least it doesn’t happen here? If you do, chances are you haven't been to a First Nation in Canada lately.

The abject poverty of Canada's aboriginal people -- the overcrowded houses riddled with mould, the high levels of violence and addiction, poor levels of education, massive unemployment and literacy rates that should make a western nation blush -- all are part of a picture of Canada's commitment to human rights that could earn the country a big fat "F" from the United Nations Human Rights Council next month.

"Canada is such a champion on the world stage of human rights, but when it comes to its own indigenous people, it's a different story," said Craig Benjamin, a spokesman for Amnesty Canada, one of 50 non-governmental agencies that have written to the UN slamming Canada's human rights record at home.

The UN Human Rights Council is launching a process to review the human rights record of all 192 member nations of the UN. Canada is one of 48 countries that will go under the spotlight this year. Our time in front of the committee begins early next month.

Canada is no stranger to being at odds with the UNHRC. Earlier this week, Canada was the only country to vote against -- there were 33 for and 13 abstentions -- a resolution condemning Israel for its invasion of Gaza. Like its predecessor, the UN Human Rights Commission, the council focuses much of its criticism on Israel.

In an editorial two years ago, the Free Press called the council "a lie, a Potemkin village designed to let the UN pretend that it actually cares about human rights."

Still, it carries the UN brand and its criticisms will be a welcome tool for aboriginal groups applying pressure on the federal government.

While Canada itself has submitted a report to the UN that outlines a long list of ways the country is committed to human rights, the non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are accusing the government of providing a glossed-over look at its programs that borders on flat-out falsehood.

"At best, they are using language to try and make Canada look good without just being honest about where we are," said Kathy Vandergrift, chairwoman of the Canadian Coalition for the Rights of Children.

For example, the report says aboriginal housing is a priority and points to a program supporting the construction of 2,300 new homes and renovations to 3,300 existing homes on reserves.

But that, says the Assembly of First Nations, is not even a drop in the bucket. The AFN submission to the UN says 44,000 houses on First Nations need major repairs and if housing in First Nations was at the same standard as the rest of Canada, another 87,000 new houses would have to be built.

In Garden Hill, for example, one of the largest reserves in Manitoba, one in every two homes is in need of major repairs, according to Statistics Canada.

That same reserve has no running water or sewers, forcing residents to cart water from wells around the reserve and use outhouses when it is 40 below. Fewer than one in four people are employed, and fewer than one in five finish high school.

Those are the kind of statistics, says National Chief Phil Fontaine, that beg the attention of Canadians.
"Canadians are fair-minded," said Fontaine. "If they knew better than they do about why we're so impoverished, they'd bring considerable pressure on the Canadian government to do the right thing."

He's hopeful the UN process goes a long way to attracting that attention.

Amnesty's Benjamin said he thinks the process might force Ottawa to act, because a public shaming by a body Canada helped create -- and lobbied to be a member of -- would be hard for the government to ignore.
"When you seek to be a member of this council, you are making a commitment to human rights," said Benjamin. "It would be quite contradictory to seek membership and then ignore the recommendations."

Among the bigger problems raised with the UN was Canada's refusal to sign the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous People in 2007.

Canada then and now says that declaration was overly vague and was inconsistent with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Instead, Canada says it will ensure the rights of indigenous people its own way, including through legislation passed last year that eliminated the exemption of First Nations from being subject to the Canadian Human Rights Act.

Manitoba MP Rod Bruinooge, a Métis and former parliamentary secretary for Indian Affairs, said last summer the extension of the act meant the federal government could no longer legally ignore the Canadian Human Rights Act when making decisions about First Nations.

"The double standard of human rights protection for some but not for First Nations people is gone and it is gone forever," Bruinooge said in a speech at the Assembly of First Nations annual meeting in July.

But Fontaine says that legislation in and of itself violated the spirit of human rights because it wasn't created with an appropriate level of consultation with First Nations. Fontaine said the government can't pretend to have extended human rights to First Nations when it still refuses to endorse the UN declaration.

"The unfortunate message we received from this is that this government is going to pick and choose what human rights it will defend," said Fontaine. "It is a stain on Canada's international reputation."

Benjamin said Canada's refusal to sign that agreement is an oddity, and even worse is Canada's claim that because it didn't agree with the declaration, it doesn't apply in Canada.

"That breaks apart the whole notion that human rights are universal," said Benjamin. He said Canada, of all countries, can readily afford to ensure the rights of aboriginal people are protected.

"If Canada doesn't do it, what does that say to the rest of the world?" he asked.

He added the fact a country as rich and developed as Canada has an entire segment of the population with such undeniably poor living situations is a huge blight.

"Canada is such a champion on the world stage of human rights. But when it comes to indigenous people, it is a different story," said Benjamin.

The differences in standard of living for Canada's First Nations people is stark. From housing to education, health to family finances, the experience of most aboriginal Canadians is bleak.

One in every four First Nations children lives in poverty, and seven in 10 will never finish high school. Unemployment on some reserves exceeds 90 per cent, adding stress to overcrowded living conditions, shoddy housing and, in many communities, no running water or functioning sewer system. First Nations people have shorter life expectancies, and are far more likely to be victims of violence, particularly First Nations women.

Amnesty Canada says young First Nations women are five times as likely to die a violent death as other women their age. Benjamin says what's frustrating is that even though there has been a recognition of that from all levels of government, next to nothing is being done.

"To pass it off to say we've given funding for public education is pretty disappointing," said Benjamin.

The AFN says the government has been told repeatedly it is chronically underfunding aboriginal children in areas such as education, child welfare and housing. And many times the government itself has acknowledged that to be true, including in the report to the UN.

But Fontaine says the fact the government has failed to actually do anything about it is taken by the AFN as an indication the underfunding is deliberate.

Benjamin says government inaction in the face of knowing the reality, is likely a result of racism -- both endemic to government itself and to the Canadian people who aren't demanding more from the government.

Three years ago, an agreement between Ottawa, the provinces and aboriginal leaders was supposed to have been a major step towards closing the gap in the standard of living of aboriginal peoples and the rest of Canada. Known as the Kelowna Accord, the $5-billion agreement was to have dealt with a number of areas, including investing in housing, education, economic development and health care.

Benjamin says Kelowna alone would not have meant a complete improvement towards ensuring the rights of Canada's aboriginal people.

"Funding alone has never been the solution," said Benjamin. "But I do think the accord signalled an attempt to significantly close that gap."

This upcoming federal budget is likely to produce an investment in First Nations education and infrastructure. Indian Affairs Minister Chuck Strahl promised as much in interviews this week.

The AFN is asking for Ottawa to implement Kelowna and add an additional $3 billion over two years for massive housing repairs and new schools.

Fontaine said anyone who thinks they are unaffected by the poverty of First Nations people should give their head a shake. "This is not just a burden on our people," he said. "It's a burden on the entire country."

mia.rabson@freepress.mb.ca

Statistics (-- Assembly of First Nations, Amnesty Canada, United Church of Canada, Statistics Canada

  • 19 per cent of Canadians between 20 and 24 haven't completed high school. For aboriginal people in the same age bracket, the rate is 44 per cent.
  • The infant mortality rate for aboriginal babies is 20 per cent higher than the rest of Canada
  • Aboriginal people are three times as likely to have Type 2 diabetes
  • The unemployment rate for all Canadians is about 6.6 per cent. On most reserves it is 29 per cent. Among aboriginal people overall it is 19.1 per cent.
  • Aboriginal Canadians have a median employment income of $16,000. The median employment income for other Canadians is roughly $25,000.
  • One out of every four First Nations children lives in poverty compared to one in six other Canadian children.
  • First Nations families are three times more likely to experience poor living conditions.
  • Mould contaminates almost half of all First Nations households.
  • More than 100 First Nations communities have to boil their drinking water.
  • One aboriginal child in eight is disabled, double the rate of all children in Canada.
  • Overcrowding among First Nations families is double the rate of that for all Canadian families.

5 comments:

Frank Godon said...

It amazes me that Aboriginal people complain about their situation and do nothing themselves to change it but instead prefer to blame someone! Residential schools, family, white man, government, etc. Why are they always the victim???

- 19 per cent of Canadians between 20 and 24 haven't completed high school. For aboriginal people in the same age bracket, the rate is 44 per cent.

** Could it be that most are too damn lazy to finish school when the work gets harder as they get older? They would rather party all night and then sleep during the day not bothering to go to their classes. Take the easy way out. The path of least resistance. **

- The infant mortality rate for aboriginal babies is 20 per cent higher than the rest of Canada

** Maybe if they quite impregnating younger girls their babies would have a better chance at surviving! If they were to move from their isolation areas to civilization where they would find better medical treatment that would help. **

- Aboriginal people are three times as likely to have Type 2 diabetes

** Its all in the diet and physical fitness. I know I have type 2 diabetes and if I gain too much weight my blood sugars go up, I loose the weight and become more physically active, my sugars remain normal. Also if I eat right foods, everything is normal **

- The unemployment rate for all Canadians is about 6.6 per cent. On most reserves it is 29 per cent. Among aboriginal people overall it is 19.1 per cent.

** First if there is no work on the reservation - move your ass to civilization and find work. Even if you have to work a minimum wage job like McD's - Getting up at 7 a.m. to get to work on time is hard, especially in winter. Working with idiot bosses is hard. Working on beautiful sunny days is hard. Working until closing time when you're tired and hungry is hard. Working when you would rather be at the beach is hard. Working when you'd rather sleep is hard. Working after you've said goodbye to your children is hard. Going to work by car or bus is hard. Coming home after a hard days work isn't any easier. Shoehorning errands into a word day is hard. But we do it.

We do it because we get a paycheque. And that lets us buy things. And lets us improve our lives. And lets us take trips. And lets us send out children to university to get better jobs than we've got so they don't' have work as hard. Except they will, only it will be hard in a different way. Because, you know, work is hard.

- Aboriginal Canadians have a median employment income of $16,000. The median employment income for other Canadians is roughly $25,000.

** See above statement **

One out of every four First Nations children lives in poverty compared to one in six other Canadian children.

** Again if there are no jobs to support your family where you are - MOVE **

- First Nations families are three times more likely to experience poor living conditions.

** see above **

- Mould contaminates almost half of all First Nations households.

** Learn to take better care of your own home. I had this problem, noticed it at the start and did something about it before it became too bad and costly. After all its your home. **

- More than 100 First Nations communities have to boil their drinking water.

** Haven't heard of water treatment plants, I'm sure with all the millions of dollars our government throws at First Nations some money can be spent on water treatment plants instead of trips to Vegas and the Chiefs 1/2 million dollar home and vehicles.

- One aboriginal child in eight is disabled, double the rate of all children in Canada.

** The majority of the disabilities is FASD. Its a huge problem that Aboriginals refuse to address. The solution is simple. And its not pamphlets. If women insist of drinking while pregnant, they have to be incarcerated until they deliver. That and only that will break the cycle.

We have the right to lock up tuberculosis carriers if they're a threat to spread the disease. What about the disease of mental disorder?

Are they prepared to do something about the FASD epidemic? Or do they want a ready-made excuse handy?

- Overcrowding among First Nations families is double the rate of that for all Canadian families.

** When a person has exactly as many children as they can afford to feed, clothe, shelter and school they will be amazed how quickly overcrowding will fall.

Popping out 8, 9, 10, 11 children is a sure way to consign them all to a life of want. Starting to breed when you're a teenager solidifies the cycle.

There are dozens of programs engaged in "family-planning." Its not hard to quickly determine which ones work and which don't by comparing the number of births next year with the number this year. It's not rocket science. **

And last but not least a word from a friend - Stop Making Excuses.

As with every recovery program, the first step is admitting you have a problem. So, no more poverty, no more residential schools, no more colonialism, no more racism, no more FASD, no more (fill in the blank). No more excuses. Period. As long as they have an excuse at the ready they don't have to change their behaviour. It's always somebody else's problem that they've failed.

When they replace blame with personal responsibility, then the world shifts on its axis. Now 'poverty' becomes "do you have a job?" "Do you have the education to get a job?" "Do you have personality problems that keep you from getting a job?" "Do you have an addiction that keeps you out of the workforce?" Each and every question has a solution.

But unless they're willing to take this step, then realize they're condemning another generation of native children to the same life that they're complaining about or worse.

Thirty years ago, Manitoba saw an influx of what was then known as "boat people." Vietnamese refugees. You want to talk poverty? You want to talk culture? Here were thousands of peasants brought from a tropical rain forest to the coldest city of its size on the planet. Ripped from their cultural roots, living in poverty worse than any Indian reserve, what happened to them?

Well, last time we looked, they were hard working taxpayers, often running sweaty corner stores or getting up early to go to their factory jobs to raise their families and watch their children collect university degrees rather than criminal records.

Twenty-five years ago we saw a new batch of immigrants, what we then called East Indians to differentiate them from the local variety. Talk about racism. With their beards and turbans they attracted the evil attention of every lunatic in the country. Where are they now?

Well, they eventually bought the taxi company that gave them their first jobs in this country. We see them in Parliament and in the hospitals. We never heard police ask for help finding a suspect "Sikh in appearance."

And the native people who were here when the Vietnamese arrived. Still whining about their lost culture. And the aboriginal people who saw the Indians arrive? Still whining about how they're all in jail because of racism. And still on welfare or begging for money downtown.

No excuses. That's the start line.

Frank Godon said...

Now for the Israeli quote, "Earlier this week, Canada was the only country to vote against -- there were 33 for and 13 abstentions -- a resolution condemning Israel for its invasion of Gaza."

At least Canada showed its grit in siding with Israel. Israel did what it had to do after months of induring rockets launched at it daily just because its Israel. This wasn't an anti-war protesting by the world it was ANTI-ISRAEL and that in my opinion is hate. Israel had every right defend itself.

Jules Morin said...

Whoa, you're right Frank, talk about a rant! I agree with a lot of what you're saying - but not everything, perhaps due to my moderate political leanings. I do admire your courage in saying it though, and you are able to say it with a tinge of humor as opposed to being purely offensive.

Okay, now I'll try to explain where and why I disagree; Without trying to get too long winded - I just got off work at 3 a.m.

As you've pointed out in some of your other posts, the World is a very corrupt place, and Western civilization is certainly no exception to this fact.

On this post you commented that mothers should be incarcerated until they deliver their babies to prevent FASD. Sounds compelling Frank, however, wouldn't that require serious policy implementation/intervention? Now, if a policy of imprisonment were a solution to alcoholic mothers and FASD, could the opposite be true? In other words, the possible probability of policy measures put in place to ensure a degree of genocide? I mean we are talking about the science of people control, are we not?

Frank, I admire the fact that you're quite educated and have the essentials of character to travel the World, and live in Russia. But keep in mind not everybody, back here in Canada, who doesn't share your tenacity is lackluster.

One of my nieces, who is a top student and on her way to becoming a doctor, went to Ghana Africa for a summer. When she came back she was telling everybody how fortunate we are to be living in Canada; Her renewed sense was that native people shouldn't feel so hard done by because of what SHE witnessed in Africa. My question was: "What do starving kids in Africa have to do with Inuit kids sniffing gas in Canada?" Other than the lack of news headlines of course? My point is, that there is a very fine line between education and the politics of state indoctrination. Intellectual welfare isn't going to bring us any closer to liberation than the welfare cheque.

The ability to think comes from within every single one of us. I never, ever feel intimidated when speaking to academics because I know they are trained thinkers.

Frank Godon said...

Jules I need to inform you that some of what I wrote was paraphrased and copied from a good friend (whom I mentioned before the last piece - he can be found at http://blackrod.blogspot.com/2007/10/memo-to-grand-chief-12-steps.html

Last time I quoted him MM refused to post because she thought he was racist - I beg to differ, as I see him as calling a spade a spade. Of course I changed some wording so it would address the issues accordingly. But most of what he wrote is appropriate here.

I understand what you mean when you say "I mean we are talking about the science of people control, are we not?" Everyone deserves that right to individual freedom to do what they want with themselves, but I guess what I am saying is that if you decide to do harm to yourself and eventually your unborn child - don't expect the rest of the world to pay for your stupid mistake. But I can also say that in good conscience I can't condemn a child that is screwed up due to the choices of his mother and would most likely myself try to do something to help them. I just don't like the excusses that Aboriginals use all the time.

Anonymous said...

I wonder if any submissions have been written on behalf of the Metis of Canada via the MNC in
North America in regards to Metis Rights in Canada? I see the United Nations work done on the
MNC page, but not sure what is being done in this regard.

This would be an excellent avenue in regards to a Submission,
to circumvent further court proceedings guaranteeing our right has Metis people to be included
in the Aboriginal reconciliation process in our Rights based agenda. Seems like this is a United
Nations issue since Canada is dragging their feet and only acting upon Court outcomes rather than what is guaranteed to us under the Constitution and our Historical place in Canada.

It seems although Metis are included in the Section 35 rights and as well the Royal proclamation of 1867, we continue to have to reaffirm these rights on a Case by Case basis through the court system.

Canada received heat just recently in its treatment of its Aboriginal citizens, and are now under pressure from the United Nations to address this lack of Human Rights legislation towards its Aboriginal inhabitants.

Opportunity is now presented itself, I wonder if the MNC has made a submission to the Expert Mechanism? or registered as a Participant?